This section specifically plans how to monetize the Greeks and Probability of Touching strikes criteria unique to each spread type for Entry, Staying In-Play and Exiting, to take Profits and limit Losses.
There
is plenty of web-available information on the construction of the well-known
spreads discussed below. I won’t unnecessarily repeat their definitions. Here, it is about emphasizing the criteria
for controlling the risks.
Design
each trade template specific to the chosen strategy, planning that chosen set
of Greeks that adds to Profit; versus, which Greeks runs the Risks of incurring
Losses. Reconcile the planned versus
actual Greeks-based P/L criteria to determine the set up of Entries and Exits,
for that particular spread traded.
Long
Calendar (Debit Spread) Plan: Theta & Vega Affects Profit, Delta &
Gamma Impacts the Loss.
Both
option legs in a Calendar share the same strike, making the intrinsic value in
a common strike the same, for the 2 legs.
Effectively, this cancels out the intrinsic value with the Short option
leg paired against the Long option leg, at the same strike.
❑ With intrinsic value removed, only the extrinsic/time value of Theta and Vega
remains in the Calendar to make it profitable. This is why the term “Time Spreads” is used to describe
Calendars.
Characteristically
of Index products, in comparing Call Calendars versus Put Calendars, the
Volatility Skews favours Puts, more so if the market drifts or trends down with
a low Volatility climate (i.e. VIX between 10-15). Unlike the current situation
with the VIX trading near 40 and above. Typical of the trait of Indices is for
their OTM Puts to carry higher Implied Volatilities compared to their
corresponding OTM Calls on the upside. The market crashes down. There is no
“crash up”. This allows
higher premium to be sold at the Short strike of the ATM Put Calendar making it
relatively cheaper than Call Calendars. With more embedded premium that can be
sold at the outset, Put Calendars can and do expand more in value to lower the
initial Debit than Call Calendars. As the Calendar starts of initially as a
Debit spread, it just makes sense to give the position better odds in the first
place of collecting more Credit on the Short leg to finance the Long leg. That’s why it makes sense to use Put
Calendars for Downside protection; but, for the Upside use Call Diagonals
(which is a Short Vertical to finance a Debit Calendar). From here on the term
“Calendar” assumes the construction using Puts.
Greeks
Profile: –Delta (~0.00), –Gamma, +Vega and +Theta
❑ Profit from selling Theta to collect increasing amounts of premium to fund a rising Vega (IV needs to increase from a lower range to a higher range).
❑ Loss arises from
sizeable Delta (and Gamma = “Delta” of the Delta) increasing.
You
want Delta and Gamma to remain as small numbers, meaning limited directional
speed and slow price movement signalling restricted range bound behaviour. You
do not want these 2 Greeks to become larger numbers.
❑ Theta is the highest
when it is ATM (Delta 0.50). A Calendar is worth the most money when it closes
exactly on the ATM strike, at expiration of the Front Month Short leg.
– This is when the Front Month Short leg
expires without any time value left (Theta ~0) and the Back Month Long leg is
ATM with one full month (or more) remaining.
– The “Roll value” of a Calendar, gets its highest value when the product’s price
is ATM producing the greatest amount of Theta to sell the Front Month option
again.
Entry
Strike width intervals. A Calendar strategy, by definition needs the product’s price to drift or inch up/down within a tightly confined range. So, choosing a product with strike increments of $1 at minimum and $2.50 at maximum between strikes, in the first place, avoids the risk of using a product that has strike intervals that are too far apart (e.g. $5–$10 intervals).
As
there is no Profit to be made using intrinsic value, it’s not sensible to
choose Calendars using a product with wider strike increments. Typically, widening a Calendar from a
$1 width to a $2 width is adequate. The need to widen a $1 width Calendar to $3
is rare (i.e. 2 strikes away from the strike the Calendar is initiated from,
typically ATM) and that would be the maximum width. Else, it would be inviting more Delta & Gamma risk than
is necessary to construct a viable Reward : Risk Roll Value. In turn,
destabilizing Theta & Vega and diluting the Roll Value.
❑ If an exact ATM strike with Delta – 0.50 is not
available, Near The Money strikes (Delta – 0.45 to – 0.55) may make sense,
depending on the Reward : Risk Ratio of the Theoretical Prices at the NTM
strikes. Deltas used here are negative, as the chosen construction is using
Puts.
❑ If the Delta of a product fails to have an ATM/Near the
Money Delta between –0.45 to –0.55; but, instead has an OTM Delta of –0.40 (or
less) jumping to an ITM Delta of –0.60 (or more), trying to construct an “ATM”
Calendar is pointless. Same rule if the Delta jumps from ITM into OTM, skipping
the ATM/Near-the-Money range, reject the product as a non-directional Calendar
candidate. A directional spread for a product with such fast Delta
characteristics is more relevant.
As
Delta denotes directional speed, look at the spatial differences between the
Delta of the ATM strike and the Deltas of the subsequent OTM and ITM strikes
moving away from the ATM strike.
❑ If the increments of 3-4 strikes towards the furthest OTM/ITM strike become
increasingly bigger per strike up/down, the product has “faster” Deltas. There
is more directional speed in each strike the closer it gets to OTM/ITM.
❑ If the increments of 3-4 strikes towards the furthest OTM/ITM strikes become increasingly smaller per strike up/down, the product has “slower” Deltas. There is less directional speed in each strike the closer it gets to OTM/ITM.
❑ Increments in an ideal Calendar would maintain near equally spaced Deltas apart
as it moves 3-4 strikes away from the ATM strike towards the OTM/ITM. In
absence of equally spaced Deltas, slow Deltas may be an acceptable alternative
for a non-directional Calendar. But, if the product shows fast Deltas, choose
another product to assess Calendar candidates.
❑ There is no need to test the spatial increments of Deltas beyond 4 strikes up/down, as a non-directional Calendar has limited Profit potential, when the product moves 4 strikes away from the ATM strike. Why? Because the extrinsic value to sell for collecting Theta as premium diminishes, as strikes move away from the ATM strike towards OTM/ITM, given the ATM strike is highest in extrinsic value.
❑ Theoretical Price.
Peculiar to a multi-month Calendar’s construction, the Short Front Month leg
will always have a different expiry cycle from the Long Back Month leg (until
the last month). This distinct
difference gives the Calendar it’s “Roll” value, which is not present in
Vertical Spreads – as both legs expire in the same month.
Separately
measure the IV differences in Theoretical Price between the Front Month to the
first Back Month, to estimate the Calendar’s payout ratio. Arguably, Theoretical Price will at
best always be an estimate. Still,
specific to the Calendar, as both legs expire at different months, it is
critical to evaluate the Theoretical Price of the first Roll separately. Then,
repeat the test for the Long leg’s subsequent Back Months remaining as Rolls
before the last month, which may not have any economic value left to Roll with
the onset of accelerating Theta decay in the last 30 days.
❑ This is the key tool to gearing the payout ratio of Reward to Risk in the
Calendar.
The
trading platform of your existing broker should already have an in-built
Theoretical Price function in it for free.
IV. The lower the
Back Month’s IV is to the Front Month’s IV, the cheaper the initial Debit of
the Calendar. Remember, the Calendar’s Short /”Sell” leg is the Front Month
option and the Long/”Buy” leg is the Back Month option.
❑ For the Short/”Sell” leg, choose an option about 3-7 weeks away from
expiration.
❑ For the Long/”Buy” leg, choose between 2-3 months (1 Roll at minimum, 2 rolls
at maximum) away from expiration, to see which Back Month yields the lowest
initial Debit.
Index
products are ideal to trade Calendars, as their Back Month options typically
have an IV about the same, if not marginally lower/higher (within –/+ 5%), than
their Front Month options’ IV.
An
iVolatility IV forecast in the lower ranges (0.20–0.30 deciles; or, 0.60–0.80)
moving up by +0.10 deciles representing an increase of +10% in IV is an ideal
opportunity. IV forecasting tools from iVolatility.com have been blended into
the Home Options Trading techniques.
❑ Select a $1.5 Reward at minimum
(ideally $2) to $1 Risk Ratio.
In
a Calendar, the Reward is the Theoretical Price’s estimate of the payout. And
the Maximum Risk is limited to the Initial Debit.
So,
to determine how many Back Months to embed into the Long option, assess the
number of months that will yield the biggest difference between the Initial
Debit and Theoretical Price. For example, compare a Calendar with
❑ 3 months apart, e.g. Apr-Jun with 2 rolls in it: Initial Debit is $0.70 and
Theoretical Price payout is $1.05. So this is a $1.5 Reward : $1 Risk
opportunity; versus,
❑ 3 months apart, e.g. May-Sep with 2 rolls in it: Initial Debit is $0.90 and
Theoretical Price payout is $1.58. So, this is a $1.75 Reward : $1 risk opportunity.
Choose
the Calendar with the higher payout of Reward. You do not need to use all the
Rolls, especially if you have met the Roll Target of halving the initial Debit
with the first Roll. How do you work out the exact Theoretical Price to target
the first roll of the Calendar? Click here.
As
it is the Long leg that generates the Profits, whereas the Short leg finances
the Long leg, take the effort to evaluate the Long leg separately to make sense
of the payout.
❑ Remember to value the
Long Calendar for its Theoretical Price, to buy this as a Debit spread below
the market value. See Price Scout: Work the Entry Hard.
Open Interest.
❑ For the Front Month Short leg, the Open Interest should be at minimum 10–20
times the number of Calendar contracts you plan to fill. (e.g. If you plan to
do 4 ATM Put Calendars, the Open Interest number
for the ATM Put strike needs be above 40). Same rule applies when rolling – the
strike in the following Front Month that the Short option is being rolled to
must have at least 10–20 times Open Interest.
❑ Same for the Back Month Long leg, check
that Open Interest is between 10–20 times the number of Calendar contracts you
plan to fill at that same strike.
Exit
(versus Stay In-Play)
For a Calendar Exit always test
❑ How
much of a +/– change in Price will cause zero change in the Calendar’s
Theoretical Price, i.e. Reward = Risk, a point of no Profit but also no
Loss. Plan below/above this price,
as an Exit/Roll.
❑ How much of a +/– %
change in IV (rush & crush) will cause zero change in the Calendar’s
Theoretical Price, i.e. Reward = Risk, a point of no Profit but also no Loss.
Plan below/above this IV%, as an Exit/Roll.
–
Specifically for IV, you must stress test the % change in IV of the Short leg separate
of
the % change in Long leg. Why?
Breakdown the construction of the Calendar. The Short leg needs to make money from the Credit collected
(premium from Theta sold), as well as IV falling. IV rising in the Short leg
wipes out the Theta collected as premium.
The Long leg only makes money as IV rises while suffering the Loss of
Theta decay. But as the Short leg’s IV falls, at the same time, the Long leg’s
IV will also fall; but, at different rates. The analysis is flawed if you
assume IV’s fall on the Short leg shares the same trajectory as a rise in IV on
the Long leg, simply because both legs share the same strike. Remember the
Short leg is in a Front Month while the Long leg has multiple Back Months built
into it.
❑ Forward the date to
each expiration cycle (1 or 2 rolls) to note the dates before expiration of
when Theta’s premium contribution of the Short leg fails to compensate the Long
leg’s accelerating Theta decay, especially in the final expiration month of the
Calendar. Take note of the date/specific week when Reward = Risk, when no
Profit but also no Loss is made.
Plan the week(s) of these dates to watch for an Exit/Roll.
Plan
each Exit scenario independently. Then, keep the worst case scenario of the Price
change, add the worst case scenario of the IV% change and combine the remaining
days discounted with forward dates for a complete and robust stress test of the
Calendar’s Exit plan.
Any
change that adds to Profits, re-evaluate the Roll value. Any change that incurs
Losses, consider an Exit. A Roll
may or may not be 10 days from expiration. It may be sooner. Though, never Roll a Calendar inside
expiration week, as it leaves the Long leg unhedged in that week itself. Always, give priority to Theoretical
Price to guide you on timing the date or the week for an Exit/Roll.
❑ Base the Break Even
Exits of the Calendar on the strikes above/below where the Calendar is
initiated (typically ATM) and Theoretical Price conditions.
– Increase/decrease the product’s price up/down to a point where the Theoretical
Price of the Calendar is not making Profit or incurring a Loss. These are the
specific points where the Calendar can move up/down to with zero Roll value
remaining – points where the Calendar loses its ability to generate a Profit.
As
IV changes, this impacts the value of the Back Month(s) option. Subsequently,
affecting the Calendar’s Theoretical Price Payout, which makes it mandatory to
re-assess the trend of the Probability of Touching the Break Even strikes on a
weekly basis.
❑ Remain
in trade, to Roll the Front Month Short option, if the $1.50 Reward : $1 Risk
ratio holds up and is Supported by an increasing/progressively modest rise in
IV.
–
About 5 days before the 10 days to the Short option’s expiry, look for
highest/higher Roll values as product’s price drifts between Deltas of –0.45 to
–0.55. At these Delta ranges, Theta produces higher/the highest time value to
sell the Roll for. Once within the 10 day period before expiry, you are
unlikely to get higher Credit premiums to sell, mechanically Roll the Calendar
if the Roll can at least lower the initial Debit by 10%–15% for the minimum
economic justification to proceed onto the second roll. Otherwise, exit
entirely.
–
The higher the Front Month Short option’s IV is compared to the Back Month Long
option’s IV, the higher the Credit you will receive for selling the Short
month, to lower the cost of the initial Debit more than you would otherwise
get.
❑ Monitor
the Calendar more vigilantly if the $1.50 Reward drops down to a $1.25 Reward :
$1 Risk ratio, with an increasing/mild rising trend in the Probability of
Touching the Break Even points.
❑ Exit the entire Calendar if the ratio drops below $1.25 Reward : $1 Risk, with a rising trend in the Probability of Touching the Break Even Points and a flat IV trend. Do not wait to lose 50%-100% of the Initial Debit before exiting entirely. Losing 100% of the Initial Debit is the Maximum Loss.
❑ Use Point &
Figure charting techniques: Look left at the last 3 columns of Xs and Os. Take
the Longest column of Xs and Longest column of Os (widest trading ranges) as
the worst-case test for a price move in either direction in evaluating a
non-directional Calendar’s Probability staying ATM/Near The Money.
An Exit at Maximum
Profit is obvious. Maximum Profit occurs when the product’s price remains at
the strike of the Short leg at expiration. The Front Month’s Short option
expires worthless, while the Back Month retains the highest Theta (extrinsic
time value) as it remained ATM.
❑ If the product’s price fails at expiration to stay precisely at the strike of
the Short leg, there is zero intrinsic value left. Remember, the Short leg and Long leg share a common strike,
eliminating any intrinsic value.
❑ An ATM Calendar is worth approximately the same, if price closes an equal
distance ITM or OTM from the ATM strike.
❑ Close out the
Calendar entirely, once you have rolled to the final month before expiration of
the Short option. Else, all that is left is a Long naked option exposed to Delta
and Gamma risk, plus accelerating Theta decay.
Back
Ratio Spread (Credit, Even Money or Debit Spread) Plan:
Delta,
Gamma & Vega affects Profit, Theta Impacts the Loss.
A
Back Ratio Spread is essentially a Short Vertical Spread, plus buying 1–2 more
options at the Long strike. Hence, the ratio of 1 Short option: 2 Long options
or 1 Short option : 3 Long options. Regardless of the ratio, the position is
always Net Long options. Remember you need to be Net Long for the directional
bias you have forecasted: Calls being Bullish and Puts are for a Bearish
outlook.
❑ Due to the embedded Vertical, you need a sizeable movement in the expected
price direction (Delta & Gamma) and IV to rise as forecasted – these are
the Greeks to plan for to generate Profits. Remember, the entire position has to fight against the extra
Long options’ increasing Theta decay.
The Short Vertical (choose ATM to ITM strikes) is embedded deliberately
to subsidize the purchase of the Long options (which shares the same strike of the
Long leg of the Short Vertical). Being Net Long options, requires IV to take
the central role in increasing the value of the Long legs. Hence, the Back
Ratio Spread is often called a “Volatility” spread.
Greeks Profile for a Back Ratio Call: +Delta, +Gamma, +Vega and –Theta
Greeks
Profile for a Back Ratio Put: –Delta, +Gamma, +Vega and –Theta
❑ Profit from increasing +/–Delta, +Gamma and +Vega (IV needs to increase from a lower range to a higher range). The Net Long position depends on increases in these 3 Greeks to make money.
❑ Loss arises from Theta decay. The Short ITM option’s Credit is used to finance the decay of the Long ITM/ATM or Near The Money (NTM) leg. While Theta is highest ATM – where the sale of the Short leg here collects the highest possible Credit – practically speaking this may not be the logical strike to construct the Short leg. As price will need to move pas 1 Standard Deviation for the Back Ratio to begin breaking even and closer to 2 Standard Deviations to generate a Profit. This overburdens Delta & Gamma to make such a huge move, effectively lowering the odds of making Profit. It makes more sense to sell the Short leg deep ITM to collect adequate credit to almost offset the cost of buying the Long leg’s ITM/ATM or NTM options.
❑ A positive Vega means
IV must rise as forecasted from a lower range to a higher range, for the Long
leg’s ITM/ATM or NTM options to increase in value.
Entry
❑ Choose a ratio of 1
ITM Short option: 2 ITM/ATM/NTM Long options at a minimum; and, 1 ITM Short
option: 3 ITM/ATM/NTM Long options at maximum. Select the ratio that buys you
the most Long OTM options, with the total cost of the entire position near zero
(or a small debit below $0.75).
❑ The way to look at the Credit of the Short ITM option in subsidizing the Long
options, is to ask how many Long ITM/ATM/NTM options can the Short ITM option
finance – is it 2 or 3?; before, it becomes an outright Debit spread where you
would typically pay up to 1/3 for the strike width of a Debit
Vertical? Choose the combination
(2 or 3) that is closest to placing the entire Back Ratio Spread for ~$0.00
(even money). Typically, it is
unlikely that the one Short option’s Credit can subsidize completely the
purchase of more than 2–3 Long options.
❑ If the construction allows for a Credit, at maximum,
leave $0.01 to $0.10 Credit in the position. Use up as much of the Short
option’s Credit to finance the Long options, as it is the Long legs of the Back
Ratio that generates the Profits. The Short leg merely acts as a subsidy for
the Theta decay working against the Delta and Gamma of the Long legs that are
fighting against the decay to increase in value, as IV rises.
❑ While price may move
in the direction forecasted, the size of the move may lack sufficient Delta and
Gamma to adequately increase the value of the Long ITM/ATM/NTM option(s) – as
the Long options are further away from the product’s price – compared to the Short leg being deep
ITM which is more likely to increase in value, being closer to the product’s
price. As all options are in the same expiry month, the nearer it is to
expiration, there is more pressure on the size and directional speed of Delta
and Gamma’s velocity to move the Long option(s), as the Short ITM option’s
Gamma becomes smaller.
❑ The Back Ratio spread’s risk is characterized by its “Valley of Loss”. It is
the size of Delta plus Gamma’s move that needs to overcome the Valley’s width.
And the Valley’s depth is a battle between how much Profit a positive and
increasing Vega can contribute against how much Loss a negative and increasing
Theta takes away with each day of decay. This is why it makes sense to
construct the position to fill at near even money or a small Credit to begin
with to make the Valley of Loss as shallow as possible from the first day of
entry.
❑ Vega must rise to supplement the inadequacies of Delta & Gamma’s move. The
positive Vega in a Back Ratio Spread means IV must increase for the position to
become profitable.
❑ As the position will
always be Net Long more naked options, it is not prudent to place a Back Ratio
Spread for an large Debit at the start. Do not give up the opportunity to
subsidize the Long naked option(s) with as much credit as you can sell in the
Short leg. If you are absolutely
certain of the product’s price direction, get a Long straight ITM call/put option
and pay the Debit. At the same time, do not lower the number of Long options
just to get a Credit, as it is the Long legs that are responsible for
generating the Profit.
Given
the Net Long feature of these spreads, construct a
❑ Back Ratio Call spread to be Net Long at the ITM/ATM/NTM Higher Call strike, for $0.00 or a Credit between $0.01–$0.10.
– At minimum, the Probability of the Call Back Ratio spread Touching its Higher strike should be 30%–50% more than the spread Touching its Lower strike. More than 60%, you may well consider a straight ITM call.
❑ Back
Ratio Put spread to be Net Long at the ITM/ATM/NTM Lower Put strike, for $0.00
or a Credit between $0.01-$0.10.
– At minimum, the Probability of the Put
Back Ratio spread Touching its Lower strike should be 30%-50% more than the
spread Touching its Higher strike.
More than 60%, you may well consider a straight ITM put.
❑ In
both scenarios, if you are unable price the spread at $0.00 or a minimum Credit
between $0.01–$0.10; and, the preferred range of the Probability of Touching
the 1 Standard Deviation’s boundary towards the profitable strike fails to be
met, reject the Back Ratio opportunity and evaluate another product.
Strike width
intervals. In constructing the Back Ratio Spread for a minimal Credit/even
money ($0.00), you will have to widen out the strikes. Effectively, stretching
the horizontal width of the Valley of Loss.
❑ Choose a product with strike increments of $1 at minimum and $2.50 at maximum
between strikes. Choose products with tighter strike intervals in the first
place, as you will need to widen the strikes apart to price the spread at near
$0.00 or a Credit.
❑ Avoid a product with strike intervals of $5–$10, as you will end up with a Valley of Loss as wide as $30 (or more) apart between the lower and higher strikes to price the position near $0.00. This places over–reliance on Delta and Gamma to move violently in your forecasted price direction, to bridge such a large gap before the position can even start to break even, let alone become profitable.
❑ The Valley’s depth is determined by how many more Long options there are than
the one Short option. The more Long options there are, the deeper the Valley.
Always, choose a ratio that keeps the Valley’s depth shallow to limit the risk.
Work on the width of the Valley first.
Then, if needed, adjust the ratio of Long options to the Short option to
change the depth of the Valley.
As
Delta denotes directional speed, look at the spatial differences between the
Delta of the Short ITM strike and the Deltas of the Long NTM strikes moving
away from the ATM strike.
❑ If the increments between strikes towards the NTM strike becomes increasingly
bigger per strike, the product has “faster” Deltas. There is more directional
speed in each strike moving towards the furthest OTM strike. Fast Deltas moving to the Long NTM
strike is favourable for the Back Ratio Spread signalling more directional
speed towards the Break Even Point and the outer boundary of 1SD. What is not
favourable is fast Deltas towards the Maximum Risk point, when price moves in
the opposite direction it was forecasted to move.
❑ If the increments between strikes towards the NTM strike becomes increasingly
smaller per strike, the product has “slower” Deltas. There is less directional
speed in each strike moving towards the furthest OTM strike. Slow Deltas moving
to the Long NTM strike is not favourable for the Back Ratio Spread signalling
lack of directional speed towards the Break Even Point and the outer boundary
of 1SD. What is favourable is slow Deltas towards the Maximum Risk point, when
price moves in the opposite direction it was forecasted to move.
IV. Placing a Back Ratio spread at lower IV levels helps price it closer to $0.00/near even–money. At lower IV levels, the ITM Credit received from the sale of the Short option to fund the purchase of more Long options is lower than if IV were in the mid-levels; but, the IV of Long options has less to rise if they have already risen to the mid-levels. This is the trade-off.
❑ An iVolatility IV forecast in the lower ranges (0.20–0.30 deciles; or,
0.60–0.80) moving up by +0.10 deciles representing an increase of +10% in IV is
an ideal opportunity. IV forecasting tools from iVolatility.com have been
blended into the Home Options Trading techniques.
Currency
ETFs/UltraShort Pro Shares & Commodity Indexes are suited for Back Ratio
spreads, as their IV characteristically behaves in an explosive manner.
❑ Target a $1.5 Reward to $1 Risk
Ratio, at minimum.
The
Maximum Risk is the width of the Back Ratio spread (difference between Long and
Short strike), minus the Credit received; or, plus the Debit paid.
Work
the entry hard, it makes sense to value the spread for its Theoretical Price,
to fill it slightly above market value if the Back Ratio is to be done for a
credit; or marginally below market value if the Back Ratio is to be done for
debit. See Price Scout: Work the Entry Hard.
Evaluate the Reward
in context of 1 Standard Deviation (+1σ, –1σ). For a
❑ Back Ratio Call
spread, the Probability of Touching the Upside Exit within +1σ from the live
price needs to be 60% or more. This leaves a 50+% Probability of Price reaching
the Upside boundary of +1σ.
❑ Back Ratio Put
spread, the Probability of Touching the Downside Exit within –1σ from the live
price needs to be 60% or more. This leaves a 50+% Probability of price reaching
the Downside boundary of –1σ.
❑ Determine at what price, after +1σ or –1σ is passed that a Reward of 1.5 times
the risk incurred can be made. Then, test if the Probability of Touching this
price point is at least 40%. Also,
raise Volatility by +10% to see how much more the Probability increases. Reject any opportunity that fails to
yield a 40% Probability of Touching the price point at which a $1.5 Reward per
$1 Risk is generated.
❑ Likewise, evaluate
the Risk in context of 1 Standard Deviation (+1σ, –1σ). Take note of the price at the lowest
point in the “V” shape of the Valley’s bottom – evaluate the Probability of
Touching this price point – it is where the Maximum Risk of the spread occurs.
Within
+1σ or –1σ, for a
❑ Back Ratio Call,
compare the Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk point against the
Probability of Touching the Upside Exit.
❑ Back Ratio Put,
compare the Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk point against the
Probability of Touching the Downside Exit.
– In both cases, the Probability of
Touching the Upside/Downside Exits should be at minimum 10% (ideally 20%) more
than the Probability of Touching the point of the Maximum Risk. If there is no material edge in the
Upside/Downside Exits having obviously higher odds than the Maximum Risk point
of being touched, consider a Strangle/Straddle instead.
❑ Remember to value the Back Ratio
Spread for its Theoretical Price, to fill it close to near even money or as a
Credit spread between $0.01 to $0.10 above the market value. See Price
Scout: Work the Entry Hard.
Open Interest &
Days to Expiry
❑ For both the Short and Long legs, choose strikes with Open Interest between
10-20 times the number of Back Ratio spread contracts you plan to fill. This ensures adequate liquidity,
especially when its time to exit the trade.
❑ Look to fill the spread between 80-90 days at minimum to 100-120 days at
maximum before expiration.
Exit
Criteria for Profit/Loss (versus Stay In-Play)
❑ Maximum Profit is
finite – the product can drop to zero, in a Back Ratio Put. A Call Back Ratio
Call Spread’s Profit is “unlimited” (in theory).
❑ The guideline to exit the Call or Put Back Ratio spread is when the Profit is
1.5-2.0 times the original Risk (which could have been a small Credit or
$0.00).
❑ If price has violently shot past the
Long leg’s strike, it is unlikely to move favourably much more. The price movement would have gone past
1 Standard Deviation and is 1/3rd to half-way towards the boundary of 2
Standard Deviations, which is a rare event. Profit at this level is an obvious
signal to close out the entire spread.
❑ Once the Profit Target is met, there is an alternative to closing out the entire spread. Sell off only the additional Long option(s). Meaning, the Short Vertical Spread remains in play – in losing its maximum Credit premium, you have drained the Credit effectively to finance the Long options. If price reverses in the opposite direction of the Back Ratio Spread, the Short option of the Vertical remaining in-play becomes even cheaper to buy, increasing its Profit contribution. Mechanically close out the Vertical 7–10 days before expiration. Do not leave it in–play inside expiration week. Price may have dropped/risen to a Support/Resistance level within the expiration week. Do not risk a reversal against the Vertical’s position with limited days to recover, as there is a remaining Short option in the spread with an obligation to settle it.
As IV changes, this impacts the value of the additional Long option(s). Remember, in a Back Ratio spread the Long leg has 1–2 more “naked” options which needs a rise in IV to become profitable. Subsequently, affecting the spread’s value, which makes it mandatory to re–assess the trend of the Probability of Touching the Upside/Downside Exits against the Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk point, on a weekly basis.
❑ Stay
in play, if the Probability of Touching the Upside/Downside Exits exceeds the
Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk by 10% or more.
– A positive trend is when this difference in Probability of Touching the Upside/Downside Exits increases every week – progressively beyond 10% (without a break across weeks where it falls below 10% for a sustained 2–3 days), in favour of Touching the Upside/Downside Exit. The Probability of Touching the Upside/Downside Exit should increase from the original 50% (which was an entry criteria) towards 60%. Consequently, the Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk point should fall by a near equal %.
Exit
the trade, if the Probability of Touching the Break Even Exit falls below the
Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk by 10% or less.
❑ A negative trend is when this difference of Probability of Touching the Upside/Downside Exits decreases every week – regressively below 10% (without a break across weeks where it rises above 10% for a sustained 2–3 days), in favour of Touching the Maximum Risk point. The Probability of Touching the Break Even Point itself fails to increase from the original 50% (which was an entry criteria); but, is reduced towards 40%. Consequently, the Probability of Touching the Maximum Risk point rises by a near equal %. This signals the Probability of price Touching the Upside/Downside Exit has lost its edge to move away from the Maximum Risk point. Do not wait to incur 50+% of the Maximum Loss before exiting entirely.
Point & Figure charting
techniques: Look left at the last 3 columns of Xs and Os.
❑ Shortest column of Xs
(tightest Upside range) as the worst-case test for a favourable price move up
of a Bullish Back Ratio Call’s Probability. Use the Longest column of Os
(widest Downside range) as the worst-case for price moving in the opposite
direction of a Bullish Back Ratio Call’s Probability.
❑ Shortest
column of Os (tightest Downside range) as the worst-case test for a favourable
price move down of a Bearish Back Ratio Put’s Probability. Use the Longest
column of Xs (widest Upside range) as the worst-case for price moving in the
opposite direction of a Bearish Back Ratio Put’s Probability.
❑ Exit on price drifting with 35–40 days before expiry. With 1–2 weeks before 30 days remaining, if price fails to move past 1 Standard Deviation; but, inches up/down or drifts within the Upside/Downside Exit of the Long strike and the boundary at –1σ and +1σ, exit the position that shows a marginal Profit or Loss. Close out the entire spread to avoid incurring the Maximum Risk.
❑ With 5–10 days before 30 days to expiry, while the Credit of the Short option is funding the additional Long options, there is not much Delta, Gamma & Vega can do to generate Profit in the Long leg. There is only Theta decaying at the square root of time (days) that is certain, accelerating exponentially with 21–23 days remaining before expiry. This Theta decaying as premium collected only acts as the subsidy for the Long options, it does not generate the Profit.
❑ Alternative Exit for
directional failure. Price moves in the opposite direction to that originally
planned for the Back Ratio Spread: Call = Bullish, Put = Bearish. Other than closing out the entire
spread, buy back only the Short option – if possible, for $0.20 or less; but,
leave the additional Long options in play. The absence of the Short option takes out the Valley in the
Maximum Risk, should price reverse back towards the original direction
forecasted.
Short
Iron Condor (Credit Spread) Plan: Vega & Theta affects Profit; Delta &
Gamma Impacts the Loss.
The
reason behind constructing the 2 Short OTM Verticals (a Call Vertical + a Put
Vertical) of a Short OTM Iron Condor equidistant from the product’s price, is
to “neutralize” the risk of movement in Delta and Gamma. For entry, do not leg
into the position as 2 separate Verticals. Enter into the position as a whole
Iron Condor.
❑ While the “wing span” of a typical Iron Condor appears equally balanced in
terms of the left and right distance apart from where price is trading, the
price dispersion of the product is unlikely to take the form of a normal bell
shaped curve –where the left halve is the exact mirror image of the right
halve. The Skew bias in the product
– most notably in certain Index products, can flip between being positive and
negative, throughout the expiration cycle.
Greeks
Profile: –Delta (~0.00), –Gamma, –Vega and +Theta
❑ Profit from increasing amounts of Theta decay and descending Vega (IV needs to drop from a higher range to a lower range).
❑ Loss arises from
sizeable Delta (and Gamma = “Delta” of the Delta) increases. You want Delta and Gamma to remain a
small number, meaning limited directional speed and slow price movement
signalling restricted range bound behaviour. You do not want these 2 Greeks to
become large.
While Delta is not
exactly equal to an option’s Probability of Expiring ITM, in essence it is more a proxy, Delta is valid to use it
as the starting point in constructing the wingspan of the Iron Condor.
❑ As the aim is to
retain nearly all of the Credit sold within the 2 Short Verticals on either
side, a Credit Iron Condor is typically constructed around where the Delta for
Calls is between +0.20 to +0.30
and the Delta for Puts is between –0.20 to –0.30.
–
Selling an Iron Condor within the Delta range of +/– 0.20 to +/– 0.30 gives the
Short Verticals on both sides a ~65%-75% Probability of success for the Credit
received to expire worthless. At
maximum, tighten the wing span to choose Calls and Puts with a Delta of +/–
0.35 for a 60% Probability of success but no tighter. You want more than 50:50
odds of retaining the credit collected as premium.
Entry
Strike width
intervals. An Iron Condor strategy, by definition needs the product’s price to
drift or inch up/down within a tightly confined range. So, choosing a product with strike
increments of $1 at minimum and $2.50 at maximum between strikes, in the first
place, avoids the risk of using a product that has strike intervals that are
too far apart (e.g. $5, $10 intervals). An alternative is to widen the $1
strike intervals to $2; or, widen out the $2.50 strike intervals to $5.
You
can sell $0.25-$0.35 out of $1 strike intervals, just as you can sell
$2.50-$3.50 out of $10 strike intervals. Though it’s not identical.
❑ Choosing an Iron Condor from a product with $10 strike intervals does not
guarantee that you can collect more Credit in selling the same fraction within
the width of the strikes in a product with $1-$2.50 strike intervals. The reason the strikes are set that far
apart in the first place, represents the propensity of the product to move at
those intervals, which poses the Delta and Gamma risks that you do not want for
a Credit Iron Condor.
❑ Lowering the initial Credit received (i.e. increasing the wing span) raises the
probability of retaining the Credit that was
sold. The entire wingspan of the Credit Iron Condor should stay within 1
Standard Deviation of where live price is trading, otherwise the Iron Condor is
not collecting adequate premium to economically justify the construction in the
first place. In other words, do not construct Short Iron Condors spanning 2
Standard Deviations wide.
Using
a product with $10 strike intervals, invites more Delta and Gamma risk than is
necessary for Theta and Vega to cope with, diluting the amount of Profit
contributed by these 2 Greeks.
Of
note, in general because the interest rate component is built into Calls plus
the inherent Skew which is typically more pronounced in Index products, the OTM
Calls can typically trade 30%-40% higher in Credit premium to sell than the
equidistant OTM Puts. Within a
Short period (less than 30 days), the richer premium on the Call side is driven
by the inherent +/– Skew of the product and less to do with the interest rate.
❑ With richer premiums on the Call side, it is often easier to get filled on more
aggressive mid-price fills by Shorting an Iron Condor when the product is going
into a small to moderate rally; but, less so with a sell-off. So, use the Futures
to gauge pre-market open trading activity, to see if the major broad-based
Indices are opening higher that day to sell the credit at marginally higher
prices (up to +0.10 above the Theoretical Price of the Credit Iron Condor) and
work the order hard to fill within 60-90 minutes of the markets opening.
❑ If
the Delta of a product fails to have an ATM/Near the Money Delta between +/–
0.45 to +/–0.55; but, instead has an OTM Delta of +/– 0.40 (or less) jumping to
an ITM Delta of +/–0.60 (or more), trying to construct an equidistant Iron
Condor with a missing “ATM” strike as the centre that joins the Short Vertical
Put together with the Short Vertical Call, as one positions adds Delta risk in
price movement.
– Deltas skipping the ATM/Near The Money
strikes represent unstable Delta and Gamma, which is not the required criteria
for an Iron Condor. Same rule if
the Delta jumps from ITM into OTM, skipping the ATM/Near-the-Money range,
reject the product to construct a non-directional Iron Condor on. An unbalanced/ratioed
Iron Condor for a product with such Delta characteristics may be more relevant.
Other
than directional risk, Delta also denotes directional speed. So, look at the
spatial differences between the Delta of the Short ATM/ITM strike and the
Deltas of the Long OTM strikes moving away from the ATM strike.
❑ If the increments between strikes towards the OTM strike becomes increasingly
bigger per strike, the product has “faster” Deltas. There is more directional
speed in each strike the closer it gets to OTM. Fast Deltas moving to the Long OTM strike is not favourable
for the Iron Condor signalling acceleration towards the Upside/Downside Exits
and the outer boundary of –1σ and +1σ.
❑ If the increments between strikes towards the OTM strike becomes increasingly
smaller per strike, the product has “slower” Deltas. There is less directional
speed in each strike the closer it gets to OTM. Slow Deltas moving to the Long
OTM strike is favorable for the Iron Condor signalling deceleration towards
the Upside/Downside Exits and the outer boundary of –1σ and +1σ.
❑ Increments in an ideal Iron Condor would maintain near equally spaced Deltas
apart as it moves 3-4 strikes away from the ATM strike towards the OTM strikes
both on the Call and Put side. In absence of equally spaced Deltas, slow Deltas
may be an acceptable alternative for a non-directional spread. But, if the
product shows fast Deltas, choose another product to construct an Iron Condor
on.
❑ There is no need to test the spatial
increments of Deltas beyond 4-5 strikes up/down, as a non-directional Iron
Condor has limited Profit potential with price moving 4-5 strikes from the ATM
strike, price will almost be Touching the Exits on either side.
❑ Never sell options
(be it an Iron Condor or Vertical) in the Front Month. In the last 21-23 days before
expiration, the negative Gamma risk outweighs the Theta premium collected. With 10-15 days to expiry, Gamma
explodes at the ATM options. Even
if Delta stays flat (~0.00), the negative Gamma risk (measuring in/stability)
expands exponentially at an acute curvature that is in multiples of Theta
decaying also exponentially (at the square root of time). Do not initiate an Iron Condor with
less than 20 days before expiry.
Point
& Figure charting techniques: Look left at the last 3 columns of Xs and Os.
❑ Use the Longest column of Xs and
Longest column of Os (widest trading ranges) as the worst-case test for a price
move in either direction in evaluating a non-directional Iron Condor’s
probability of price staying within the wing span.
IV. While at higher
IV levels, you get to sell 2 Short Verticals combined as one Iron Condor for
more Credit, the risk of IV making a higher high increases. IV forecasting
tools from iVolatility.com have been blended into the Home Trading techniques.
❑ An IV forecast in the decile ranges of 0.70–0.80 falling or 0.30–0.40
decreasing by 0.10, i.e. a drop of 10% helps drop the credit further in
addition to the Theta collected as premium in a Credit Iron Condor, given it’s
–Vega and +Theta profile.
❑ If IV is in the decile range of 0.00–0.10, IV could fail to fall lower and rise instead. IV increasing raises the Iron Condor’s Credit value, when we want it to fall to buy it back cheaper than when we sold it.
❑ If IV is in the decile range of 0.90–1.00, IV could rise to make a higher high. Again, IV increasing raises the Iron Condor’s Credit value, when we want it to fall to buy it back cheaper than when we sold it.
Broad based Indexes (e.g. DIA/DJX, QQQQ/MNX, SPY/XSP) are ideal to trade Iron Condors, because within 50 days their Front Month’s composite IV is often marginally higher than their Back Month’s composite IV. This gradual decline in IV together with price drifting collecting positive decay, improves the odds of trading Iron Condors.
❑ Even with an inherent Skew bias unique to specific Index products, its very
rare to find more than a 3%-5% difference in the composite IV between the near
and far month in most tracking Indexes/ETFs. Do not expose Iron Condors
unnecessarily to spikes in an IV rush, hoping to gamble on an IV crush after
the rush to make it profitable. Other strategies using other products are
better suited for sudden and large changes in IV differences. Within the stipulated
time frame to trade Iron Condors, the practical IV testing range of an Iron
Condor of most major tracking Indexes for an IV rise/fall is between +/– 5% to
+/– 10%. Any more will not be a realistic simulation.
The
major broad-based and tracking Indexes/ETFs are absent of single event-related
news (peculiar to a stock) that spikes the IV within any individual month.
Indexes/ETFs are more conducive to trading Iron Condors as they contain
Volatility Skews within acceptable limits that do not add Volatility risk.
❑ High IV is not a
license to sell it. IV must fall below its high. Neither is Low IV a license to
buy it. IV must rise above its low.
❑ The
core gauge of the broader market’s propensity to buy/sell 30-day IV is the
VIX. It makes more sense to
identify Short Iron Condor opportunities when the VIX is at a higher trading
range versus when it is at a lower trading range. The higher the VIX is, the IV
levels improves the odds of collecting higher premium. The historical trading
ranges of the VIX ranging between 10-20-30 was broken, since October 2008. And
a year of trading under the new ranges needs to happen, to comment on what the
new ranges would be.
The Reward : Risk Ratio of the
Iron Condor needs to be analyzed differently.
Sell at minimum 25% up to a maximum of 35%, of the strike width of the Verticals making up the Iron Condor. So, for an Iron Condor with ...
❑ $1 strike intervals for the Call and Put Short Verticals, sell the OTM strikes at +/– Delta 0.25–0.35 to receive between $0.25 to $0.40 of credit in total.
❑ $2.50
strike intervals for the Call and Put Short Verticals, sell the OTM strikes
at +/– Delta 0.25–0.35, to receive
between $0.65 to $1.00 of credit in total.
If
you have clear reasons to sell higher Call/Put Deltas, stop at +/- 0.35 Deltas
as the maximum. Otherwise, the edge in the odds of expiring ITM becomes
unfavourable towards the OTM Short strike.
Selling
these consistent fractions of the width of the Verticals making up the Iron
Condor, regardless of the different strike intervals, exposes the edge of Iron
Condor’s wings to ~40% (or less) of being touched by price movement. In turn,
giving the Iron Condor’s outer wings a minimum of ~60% (or more) probability of
price not touching them, for the position to retain the Total Credit received.
❑ At maximum, choose OTM strikes that give the entire
Iron Condor a 30% probability of both outer wings being touched by price
movement, i.e. 70% probability of not being touched. Lowering the probability
beyond 30% is margining capital on a credit spread beyond what is efficient
that could have been used for another strategy.
Regardless of the strike width chosen, the typical method of constructing an entire Iron Condor position is to contain its entire wing span within 1 Standard Deviation (–1σ to the Downside/left of the Live Price and +1σ to the Upside/right of the Live Price). Outside the range of –1σ and +1σ makes it difficult to collect sufficient credit premium to justify the return on probabilities of initiating a 4–legged, 2–ways non–directional trade.
However,
beyond the typical method and unique to trading Iron Condors is the method of
staggering the number of contracts allocated for the entire trade, across an
increasing number of strikes.
– See pagelet on the right for depiction of
staggering contracts within a given % allocation per trade.
❑ Remember to value the
Short Iron Condor for its Theoretical Price, to sell it as a credit spread
above the market value. See Price Scout: Work the Entry Hard.
Open Interest &
Days to Expiry
❑ For the entire position, choose strikes with Open Interest between 10–20 times
the number of Short Iron Condor contracts you plan to fill. This ensures adequate liquidity,
especially when its time to exit the trade.
❑ Look to fill the Iron Condor more than 35 days at minimum up to 50 days at
maximum before expiration. Below
30 days, the Credit collected is insufficient to reward the position for the
Delta & Gamma risk going into the 5-10 days before expiry. Above 50 days,
exposes the Iron Condor to too much IV uncertainty and possibly changes in
interest rates.
Exit
Criteria for Profit/Loss (versus Stay In-Play)
Exit
criteria for Profit
❑ ~10 days
before expiry, exit all 4 legs; or …
❑ If the
Short Call Vertical or Short Put Vertical’s value has dropped to $0.10-$0.15,
buy back the Vertical to close out the Short side that is closer to where price
is trading. Do not risk the possibility of price retracing in the opposite
direction to hit either side of the Short Verticals in the week of expiration
itself.
❑ For Long
options in the Verticals trading near $0.05, do not close these legs out. Buy
back only the Short options in the Verticals. This leaves you with Long options
should price bounce back unexpectedly.
❑ Always observe the closing rule of 10 days before expiry. Only if favourable pricing conditions occur as stated above, then use the variation in closing just the Short leg and leaving the Long option of the Vertical untouched. Otherwise, mechanically exit the entire Iron Condor. Some more experienced traders choose to hold the Iron Condor till 5–7 days within the expiry week itself, to close it out. Namely, this is what they have consistently done as a routine. Stay consistent with the number of days to exit: if its 10 days stick to it, if the decision to exit is between 5–7 days stick with it.
❑ Before 10–15 days expiry, when 70%–80% of the Iron Condor’s credit has been reduced, exit the trade entirely. For e.g., an Iron Condor sold for $1.00 decays down to $0.20, close out all 4 legs. The remaining 20% of Profit is marginal and not worth the Delta and Gamma risk of remaining in play. It’s not logical to risk the entire $1.00 (of which you’ve already gained ~80%) for less than 20% more Profit to milk in 2+ weeks. Guard against the greed and let sensible fear prevail.
Stay
In-Play, with 20-30 days before expiry …
❑ If the Probability of Touching the Upside/Downside wings is between 30%–40%; but, watch the position when the Probability of Touching the wings drifts higher towards 45%–55%.
❑ Watch
the Iron Condor more closely, if the iVolatility Hi/Low Indicator drifts
aimlessly between the 0.45–0.55 decile without a clear signal, if IV will drop
further or stay range bound. For example, if IV has already dropped from the
0.80 decile down to the 0.60 decile, i.e. IV has fallen 2 full deciles = 20%,
it may be bouncing against Support for the IV’s mid-range between the 0.45–0.55
decile range and fail to fall further.
❑ Be
vigilant when the original Deltas of the short OTM Calls (+0.25 to +0.35) of
the Credit Call Vertical grows larger, as price moves towards the Call Vertical
side. And when the original Deltas
of the short OTM Puts (–0.25 to –0.35 ) for the Credit Put Vertical grows
larger, as price moves towards the Put Vertical side.
– In either case, this signals the original OTM strikes are at risk of becoming
more costly to buy back, which reduces the Profit of the trade.
Exit
Criteria to Limit Losses
❑ Exit the
entire trade before/during economic or political news that violently increases
the overall market’s Volatility. i.e. VIX shoots up above its daily
volatility range.
❑ The
Probability of Touching the Exit on either the Upside or Downside of the Iron
Condor increases from the original 40% to 60%–70% with 5-10 days before expiry.
IV rises
to raise the Iron Condor’s original credit by ~125%, making it more expensive
to buy back, instead of decreasing the premium collected, which is what is
needed to make it cheaper to buy back.
❑ An Iron Condor needs to maintain a negative Vega, representing a drop in IV to
stay profitable. The negative Vega needs to become an increasingly larger
number for the forecasted fall in IV to add to Profit. If the negative Vega number
gets progressively smaller
towards ~0.00, IV is rising and without sufficient positive Theta decay to
offset the IV increase, the position starts incurring Losses. Theta collected
as premium is wiped out by a rising IV, and there may be insufficient days
remaining to collect the adequate amount of premium to restore the drop in the
credit spread. Remember, just as you can only lose 1 day’s worth of decay in a
debit spread, you can only effectively collect one day’s worth of premium per
day in a credit spread.
Straddle/Strangle
(Debit Spread) Plan: Delta, Gamma & Vega affects Profit, Theta Impacts the
Loss.
In
terms of construction, there really is only one material difference between a
Straddle and a Strangle. For any given product, if there is no +0.50 Delta Call
with a corresponding exact – 0.50 Delta Put, there is no ATM Straddle. ATM by
definition requires a precise 50:50 Delta for the Call and Put. Construct a Strangle instead using a
Near-The-Money Call and Put strike.
For
a Straddle/Strangle, a price …
❑ Rise in the product, increases
the Theoretical Price of the Call. Simultaneously, lowering the Theoretical
Price of the Put.
❑ Drop in
the product, increases the Theoretical Price of the Put. Simultaneously,
lowering the Theoretical Price of the Call.
– This increase in Theoretical Price is necessary to generate a higher sale price
than the original Debit paid, to make a Profit.
Greeks
Profile: (– / +)Delta, +Gamma, +Vega and – Theta
❑ Profit from increasing amounts of – / + Delta, + Gamma and a rising +Vega (IV needs to increase from a lower range to a higher range).
❑ The
Straddle/Strangle’s risk is characterized by its V-shaped “Valley of Loss”. It
is the size of Delta & Gamma’s move that needs to overcome the Valley’s
width. And the Valley’s depth is a battle between how much Profit a positive
Vega indicating a rising IV can contribute against how much Loss a negative and
increasing Theta takes away with each day of decay.
❑ The sum of a Call’s
Delta and Put’s Delta is mean to approximate ~1.00. It seldom equals 1.00
exactly because of the inherent Skew bias towards the Put/Call side, in any
given product. At any given
OTM/ATM/ITM strike, the sum of the absolute value of a Call Delta plus the
corresponding Put Delta is typically equal to between ~0.95–1.05 (i.e. no
exactly 1.00). Absolute value means removing the + sign in front of the Call
Delta and – sign in front of the
Put Delta.
– Specific to a Straddle/Strangle, an increase in the Call Delta results in a
near equal decrease in the Put Delta; and vice-versa.
❑ Loss arises from
sizeable Gamma reduction, Vega reduction and increasing Theta decay.
Specific
to a Straddle/Strangle, it is the Gamma and Vega that needs to work together to
overcome Theta’s decay. Gamma is at its highest ATM. Theta is also at its
highest ATM.
❑ So, as the product’s price moves towards being more ITM on the Call side
(consequently, more OTM on the Put side), IV must rise to supplement the Loss
in Gamma to overcome Theta’s acceleration. Conversely, if price moves towards
the more ITM strikes on the Put side (consequently, more OTM on the Call side),
IV needs to rise to bridge the gap of Gamma’s reduction to battle the
increasing time decay.
❑ Gamma and Theta are irreconcilable enemies.
A
Straddle/Strangle needs Gamma to hold out against Theta, until Delta moves the
price outside either the Call or Put strike forming the boundary of the “Valley
of Loss”.
With
any of the 3 Theoretical Pricing models, the mathematical expression of
Gamma (same for Calls and Puts) will show it does not share a 1:1 linear
relationship with Theta (as Calls are expressed
differently from Puts, with the interest rate built into Calls).
So,
a Straddle/Strangle needs multiples of +Gamma to offset the exponentially
increasing –Theta, with additional +Gamma left over to add to the acceleration
of Delta’s directional speed of movement.
In a Straddle/Strangle, Gamma has 2 jobs: fight Theta and Support Delta.
This also, why IV needs to rise to Support an ever-exhausting Gamma.
Think
of Theta as the necessary cost incurred to pay for the much needed explosion in
Gamma to push price outside the Valley of Loss.
Entry
Strike intervals. A
Straddle/Strangle strategy, by definition needs the product’s price to explode
outside 1 Standard Deviation (–1σ or +1σ) and move into 1/3rd to a half of the
2nd Standard Deviation (–2σ or +2σ) to make a reasonable Profit.
❑ So, choosing a product with strike increments of $1 at minimum and $2.50 at
maximum between strikes, in the first place, avoids the risk of using a product
that has strike intervals that are too far apart (e.g. $5, $10 intervals). Tighten the “Valley of Loss” - make it
narrow in the first place, by using $1–$2.50 strike intervals to reduce the
Debit paid and lower the initial risk.
At
maximum pay a Debit that is twice the strike intervals of the product. So, if
the product’s strike intervals are $1 apart, pay $2.00 at maximum. If the
product’s strike intervals are $2.50, pay $5.00 at maximum.
❑ Choose an ATM/Near
The Money Call and Put strike that has between +/– 0.45-0.55 Deltas, to
construct a Straddle/Strangle. Reject a +/– 0.60-0.40 Delta profile that is
biased towards the Call or Put side. Otherwise, the Debit is misspent on a bias
towards a “neutral” Delta, which you should be indifferent to directionally.
Other
than direction, Delta denotes directional speed, look at the spatial
differences between the Delta of the ATM/Near The Money strike and the Deltas
of the prices at 1 Standard Deviation, moving away from the ATM strike.
–
If the increments between strikes towards the price at the –1σ or +1σ boundary
becomes increasingly bigger per strike, the product has “faster” Deltas. There
is more directional speed in each strike the closer it gets to the boundary of
–1σ or +1σ. Fast Deltas moving toward
the –1σ or +1σ boundary on either side is favourable for the Straddle/Strangle
signalling acceleration towards the Upside/Downside Exit and the outer boundary
of –1σ or +1σ.
–
If the increments between strikes towards the prices at the –1σ or +1σ boundary
becomes increasingly smaller per strike, the product has “slower” Deltas. There
is less directional speed in each strike the closer it gets towards the
boundary of –1σ or +1σ. Slow
Deltas moving toward the 1SD boundary on either side is not favourable for the
Straddle/Strangle signalling deceleration towards the Upside/Downside Exit and
the outer boundary of –1σ or +1σ.
❑ For a Long straddle,
Gamma is always positive. At minimum, Gamma needs to be at least 3-4 times that
of Theta. So, other than offsetting Theta’s decay, there is adequate Gamma
remaining to manufacture enough Delta, for Delta (be it on the Call or Put side) to grow between 1.5 to 2
times its original value to move price sufficiently for the spread to be
profitable.
Point & Figure
charting techniques: Look left at the last 3 columns of Xs and Os.
❑ Use
the Longest column of Xs and Longest column of Os (widest trading ranges) as
the worst-case test for a price move in either direction in evaluating a
non-directional Straddle/Strangle’s probability of moving outside its Valley of
Loss.
❑ Also, use P&F
charting to identify price forming a Triangle pattern. Historically, if the
product shows a tendency to have either/both Bullish Triangle Breakouts and/or
Bearish Triangle Breakdowns, this makes it a stronger candidate versus one that
fails to show Triangle behaviour.
–
Ideally, the ATM/Near The Money strike you plan to buy is at a price that forms
the intersection where the triangle forms its sideways V-shaped point.
IV.
Straddles/Strangles are affordable at lower IV ranges. It is uneconomic to
trade Straddles/Strangles when the IV of the product is in the mid to high
ranges. IV forecasting tools from iVolatility.com have been blended into the
Home Trading techniques.
❑ An IV forecast in the lower decile range of 0.20–0.30 or 0.60–0.70 rising by at
least 0.10 (+10%) make for an ideal Straddle/Strangle opportunity. Between the
0.00–0.10 decile, IV could make a lower low, harming the Straddle/Strangle
which is a debit spread in need of IV rising. Choose another product to construct
the Straddle/Strangle on.
❑ Between the 0.90–1.00 decile range, IV may fail to make a higher high, harming
the Straddle/Strangle which is a debit spread in need of IV rising. Choose
another product to construct the Straddle/Strangle on.
Without
sufficient Gamma, the risk is a 0.45– 0.55 ATM/Near the Money Delta fails to
move at all and price sits in the middle of the “Valley” at the Maximum Loss,
where Theta decay is also the highest eating into the debit paid without an
adequate rise in IV to battle the Theta erosion.
Fast
markets: Commodities (Gold, Oil, Metals), Currency ETFs and the VIX are ideal
to trade Straddles/Strangles.
Any
news is welcome, for e.g. good news: relief funds/government aid in response to
bad news: floods destroying agricultural crops, fuel shortages, hurricanes,
etc. Straddles/Strangles are indifferent to good or bad news. The news just has to add sudden
uncertainty to amplify the repercussions of the single event in fast markets.
–
Much of the news is observable and embedded in the +/– Skew of the product for
a given market, without having to subscribe to news services. If you see a huge Skew (more than +/–
10%) and there’s nothing in the business news channels, someone knows something
and that someone ain’t you. Avoid the product.
❑ Seasonality. IV of
Index Options – especially OEX options – for the last 20+ years drops more than
3-4% during the July to mid-August period. IV becomes volatile from the second
half of August till September, rising 4%-5% or more.
–
This makes it an opportune time to specifically scout for buying
Straddles/Strangles throughout June, especially during the last 2 weeks of June
for 80-90 day opportunities.
–
For equity-based Indexes/ETFs, reconcile the IV range in relative terms to
where the VIX is trading at.
–
For Indexes/ETFs from other asset classes (Commodities/Currencies), use an IV
forecasting service (for e.g. iVolatility’s Advanced Historical Data, which
forecasts IV for 30-60-90-120-180 days for Calls, distinct of Puts and
Calls+Puts combined).
As the Reward of the
Straddle/Strangle only occurs after price moves past the boundaries of 1
Standard Deviation (–1σ or +1σ), there is a need to test the Probability of
Touching the Upside/Downside Exits of an identified opportunity to qualify it
as a candidate to trade.
❑ At minimum, the
Probability of Touching either Exit points on the Call or Put side needs to be
~50-60%, without an increase in IV.
❑ Then, raise the IV by
+10% to check if the Probability of Touching either strikes increases above
50%-60%. The use of +10% comes from the IV forecast specific to the IV forecast
of the IV of Calls+Puts combined for the term that the Straddle/Strange is to
be in–play.
❑ Use P&F charting
to see the 3-4 prior trading ranges of the product for both the Upside/Downside
to confirm a history of triangle formations. If the trading range for both the
Upside or Downside gets progressively larger than –1σ or +1σ after the
breakout, this improves the odds of price shooting outside the –1σ or +1σ
boundary from the ATM/Near The Money strike.
❑ Remember to value the
Long Straddle/Strangle for its Theoretical Price, to buy this as a Debit spread
below the market value. See Price Scout: Work the Entry Hard.
Open Interest &
Days to Expiry
❑ For the Straddle/Strangle, choose strikes with a minimum Open Interest between 10–20 times the number of contracts you plan to buy.
–
This ensures adequate liquidity to exit the spread, especially on the very day
price shoots past the –1σ or +1σ boundary. You want to sell off and close out the entire
Straddle/Strangle on the day of such a big move, as the probability of price
moving towards 2 Standard Deviations diminishes, after price has moved 1
Standard Deviation. At latest, you should only wait one day to lapse to close out
the position. At this point of Maximum Profit with price having made its large
move, do not risk not getting the position filled for 3-5 days. After such a
violent move, price tends to stall or may reverse and this can happen within
3-5 days.
❑ Get at least 60-70
days before the last 20 days to expiry for a Straddle/Strangle. So, at 80-90
days before expiry, look at identifying candidates. Beyond 90 days, the Debit
premium is likely to be more than twice the strike interval – do not overspend on
extrinsic value – especially at the ATM strike where it is highest, even if the
product is in the low IV range.
Exit
Criteria for Profit/Loss (versus Stay In-Play)
Exit
Criteria for Profit
❑ Target a
minimum of 1.5 and a maximum of 1.75 gain in the Debit paid for the
Straddle/Strangle. Exit entirely,
once you get between 150%-175% ROI.
❑ To get more than 2 times the Profit on
a Straddle/Strangle is a rare event, as price will need to shoot past the
half-way point of the second Standard Deviation (–2σ or +2σ) into almost 2/3rds of
it.
❑ For price to move outside –1σ or +1σ into half the area within the –2σ or +2σ
is already a extremely huge move, beyond which Gamma will be exhausted as price
has moved so far away from the original ATM/Near the Money strike (Delta
+/–0.45–0.55), into a deep ITM strike (Delta +/– 1.00) on the Call or Put side.
Stay
In-Play, 30–45 days before expiry, if price failed to move –1σ or +1σ but …
❑ The
Probability of Touching either the Upside/Downside Exit remains 50%-60%. Watch
the position more closely when the Probability of Touching drops below 50% and
drifts between 40%-45%.
❑ Positive
Gamma remains at least 2–2.5 times that of –Theta to offset the
exponentially accelerating decay, as the debit spread approaches 30 days to
expiry. Prioritize +Gamma’s ability to offset –Theta above the Probability of
Touching Break Even Points. If +Gamma fails
to offset –Theta,
count the trade as a Loss.
❑ IV is
still rising between the 0.20-0.40 deciles but has not yet reached the 0.45–0.55
decile. If IV already has reached the mid-ranges of 0.45–0.55, IV is likely to
stall; and, there may not be sufficient days remaining for IV to rise another
full 0.10 decile (+10%) to lift the Straddle/Strangle.
❑ IV at the 0.45–0.55 mid-range risk area
has “reverted” to its mean and is likely to rest at this level as both Support
and Resistance. This also poses the risk that IV may fall – an IV crush damages
the Straddle/Strangle.
Exit
Criteria to Limit Losses
❑ Exit
with 30 days to expiry, if price has not moved away from the ATM/Near The Money
strike.
❑ Within 30 days to expiry, Gamma gets higher and higher, making its curve almost
twice as tall at the ATM strike, compared to the original Gamma on the day the
Straddle/Strangle was filled. This makes the width of the Gamma curve much
narrower, effectively lowering the frequency of a potential price move outside
the –1σ or +1σ boundary.
The less frequent a –1σ or +1σ
move
is to occur, reduces the probability for price to move outside the
Upside/Downside boundary.
❑ Positive Gamma falls to 1–1.5 times that of Theta. At this level, +Gamma is suffering exhaustion and lacks the strength to offset the increasingly magnified decay of –Theta. Do not wait for Gamma to collapse, coupled with –Theta decay, price ends up staying at the bottom of the Valley incurring the Maximum Loss.
❑ With
less than 30 days to expiry, the Probability of Touching either Upside/Downside
Exit falls below 40%, with the Probability of Touching the ATM/Near The Money
strike between ~80%–90%.
Meaning, price will remain in the middle of the Valley of Loss,
incurring the Maximum Risk.
❑ IV
drifts between 0.45-0.55 deciles but fails to rise towards the 0.60
decile. IV is running up against Resistance,
as most of the mean reversion has occurred. This signals the end of IV’s rising
trend.
Short
Vertical Call/Put (Credit Spread) Plan: Vega & Theta affects Profit; Delta
& Gamma Impacts the Loss.
Verticals
are designed to be directional. The only material difference in choosing
between constructing a Vertical for a Credit versus a Debit is the range at
which the product’s IV is at and the +/– Skew of the product.
For a Credit Vertical
(Bear) Call, identify a clear Support level. A Breakdown below old
Support, forms new Resistance to identify OTM Call strikes to sell a Credit
Vertical Call.
❑ A Positive Skew helps
the Calls’ IV fall as price drops from higher call strikes to lower call
strikes in favour of the direction of the Credit Vertical Call.
– All the P&F Sell Confirmation
(Breakdown) patterns, except the Bearish Triangle Breakdown are useful in
identifying where price breaks Support towards the Downside. Only after
Confirmation, sell the Credit Vertical Call.
–
Given this is a Bearish trade, ensure the use of P&F Breakdown patterns is
below the Bearish Resistance Trend Line.
For a Credit Vertical
(Bull) Put, identify a clear Resistance level. A Breakout to the upside
above old Resistance, forms new Support to identify OTM Put strikes to sell a
Credit Vertical Put.
❑ A Negative Skew helps
the Puts’ IV fall as price rises from lower put strikes to higher put strikes
in favour of the direction of the Credit Vertical Put.
– All the P&F Buy Confirmation
(Breakout) patterns, except the Bullish Triangle Breakout are useful in
identifying where price breaks Resistance towards the Upside. Only after
Confirmation, then sell the Credit Vertical Put.
–
Given this is a Bullish trade, ensure the use of P&F Breakout patterns is
above the Bullish Support Trend Line.
Greeks
Profile for Credit Vertical (Bear) Call: –Delta, –Gamma, –Vega and +Theta
❑ Profit from –Delta getting smaller and –Gamma getting bigger as price falls down. Profit from –Vega means (IV needs to drop from a higher range to a lower range).
❑ Loss arises from
sizeable –Delta increases as price rises against the planned downward direction
with –Gamma becoming smaller.
Greeks
Profile for Credit Vertical (Bull) Put: +Delta, –Gamma, –Vega and +Theta
❑ Profit from +Delta getting smaller and –Gamma getting smaller as price rises up. Profit from –Vega means (IV needs to drop from a higher range to a lower range).
❑ Loss arises from
sizeable +Delta increases as price falls against the planned upward direction
with –Gamma becoming smaller.
Both
Verticals, share the same Theta and Vega characteristics:
❑ Profit from
increasing amounts of Theta collected as premium each passing day, at the same
time, a –Vega means IV needs to decrease from a higher range to a lower range.
❑ As the aim is to
retain nearly all of the Credit sold within the Short Vertical (be it a Bear
Call or Bull Put spread), a Short Vertical is typically constructed around
where the Delta for Calls approximates +0.30 (+0.25 to +0.35 range) and the
Delta for Puts approximates –0.30 (–0.25 to –0.35 range).
Selling
OTM Calls/Puts within the Delta range of +/–0.25 to +/–0.35 gives the Short
Verticals a ~65%-75% probability of success for the Credit received to expire
worthless. At maximum, increase
the Delta to +/– 0.40 for the Short Vertical to have ~60% probability of
retaining the credit sold; but, no higher, as you will be reaching strikes Near
The Money and towards ATM: where Gamma is at its highest.
Entry
Strike width
intervals. With a Short Vertical, as it is essentially a directional strategy,
there needs to be sufficient room for the product’s price to rise or fall. For
products with $1 strike intervals, widen the construction of the Vertical out
to $2 strike intervals apart, only if you can sell a marginally higher credit
by 0.05–0.10 with the $2 strike apart Vertical, than you can with the Vertical
being $1 strike apart. At maximum, choose a product with strike increments of
$2.50. Do not choose a product with $5-$10 strike intervals, as the change of
larger Delta risks is amplified without any added benefit of improving the ROI
on the trade.
You
can sell $0.50–$0.70 out of $2 strike intervals, just as you can sell
$2.50-$3.50 out of $10 strike intervals. Though it’s not identical.
❑ Choosing a Vertical from a product with $10 strike intervals does not guarantee
that you can collect more Credit in selling the same fraction within the width
of the strikes in a product widened out to $2 strike intervals. The reason the $10 strikes are set that
far apart in the first place, represents the propensity of the product to move
at those intervals.
Using
a product with $10 strike intervals, invites more Delta and Gamma risk than is
necessary for Theta and Vega to cope with, diluting the amount of Profit
contributed by these 2 Greeks.
Of
note, in general because the interest rate component is built into Calls, OTM
Calls are typically 30%-40% higher in Credit premium to sell than equidistant
OTM Puts. The richer premium on the Call side is also driven by the inherent
+/- Skew of the product.
–
With richer premiums on the Call side, it is often easier to get filled on
marginally higher than mid-price fills by selling a Credit Vertical Call when
the product is going into a mild to moderate rally;
–
Go Short on a Credit Vertical Put with a mild to moderate pull-back to get
filled on marginally higher than mid-price fills.
So,
use the Futures to gauge pre-market open trading activity, to see if the
major broad-based Indices are opening higher that day to sell the credit at
marginally higher prices (up to +0.10 above the Theoretical Price of the Credit
Vertical) and work the order hard to fill within 60-90 minutes of the markets
opening.
❑ As Delta denotes
directional speed, look at the spatial differences between the Delta of the ATM
strike and the Deltas of the OTM Calls/Puts you plan to sell.
–
If the Delta increments from the OTM strikes becomes increasingly bigger per
strike up/down, the product has “faster” Deltas. There is more directional
speed in each strike the closer price moves towards ITM. This is helpful, as
price can move quickly away from the OTM strikes, if it moves in the planned
direction.
–
If the Delta increments from the OTM strikes becomes increasingly smaller per
strike up/down, the product has “slower” Deltas. There is less directional
speed in each strike the closer price moves towards ITM. This is not helpful,
as price moves slowly away from the OTM strikes, if it moves in the planned
direction.
If
the Delta of a product is missing an ATM/Near the Money Delta between
+/–0.45-0.55; but, instead has an OTM Delta of +/–0.40 (or less) jumping to an
ITM Delta of +/–0.60 (or more), the product has “fast” Deltas. There is more directional speed in each
strike. As Long as price moves in the direction planned for the Vertical, this
is a benefit to the Vertical. Conversely, it can move fast against the position,
if price fails to move in the planned direction; but, moves in the opposite
direction instead.
❑ Never sell options in
the Front Month. In the last 21-23
days before expiration, the negative Gamma risk outweighs the Theta premium
collected. With 10-15 days to
expiry, Gamma explodes for the ATM options. Even if Delta stays flat (~0.00), the negative Gamma risk
(in/stability of movement) expands exponentially at an acute curvature that is
in multiples, which will overcome the Theta decaying also exponentially (at the
square root of time). During this
period, there will be inadequate Theta collected as premium to offset Gamma’s
explosion. Do not initiate a Short
Vertical with less than 20 days before expiry.
Point
& Figure charting techniques: Look left at the last 3 columns of Xs and Os.
❑ Shortest column of Xs (tightest
Upside range) as the worst-case test for a favourable price move up of a Credit
Vertical Put’s probability. Use the Longest column of Os (widest Downside
range) as the worst-case for price moving in the opposite direction of the
bullish Vertical’s probability.
❑ Shortest column of Os (tightest
Downside range) as the worst-case test for a favourable price move down of a
Credit Vertical Call’s probability. Use the Longest column of Xs (widest Upside
range) as the worst-case for price moving in the opposite direction of the
bearish Vertical’s probability.
IV. While at higher
IV levels, you get to sell Short Verticals for more Credit, there is a need to
guard against the risk of IV making a higher high. IV forecasting tools from iVolatility.com have been blended
into the Home Options Trading techniques.
❑ An IV forecast in the higher decile range of 0.70–0.80 or 0.30–0.40 decreasing
by 0.10 decile (–10%) makes for an
ideal Short Vertical opportunity.
❑ If IV is in the decile range of 0.90–1.00, IV may make a higher high. IV
increasing raises the Vertical’s Credit value, when we want it to fall to buy
it back cheaper than when we sold it. Choose another product to construct a
Credit Vertical trade on. For an existing Credit Vertical, exit the position
entirely.
❑ If IV is in the decile range of 0.00–0.10, IV may fail to make lower lows,
instead IV bounces back up. Again, IV increasing raises the Vertical’s Credit
value, when we want it to fall to buy it back cheaper than when we sold it.
Choose another product to construct a Credit Vertical trade on. For an existing
Credit Vertical, exit the position entirely.
Sector
Indexes that are interest rate sensitive (e.g. BKX Financials), seasonally
cyclical (e.g. UTY Utilities &
XLB Materials) or oil-sensitive (e.g. SOX/SMH Semiconductors) are ideal to
trade directional Verticals. ETFs in other asset classes (Currency, Emerging
Markets & Real Estate) are suited for directional Verticals as well.
–
The practical testing range of a Vertical of most major tracking Indexes for an
IV rise/fall is +/– 10%. Any more will not be a realistic simulation.
The Reward:Risk Ratio
evaluation of the Vertical is similar to that of the Iron Condor.
❑ Sell at minimum 25% up to a maximum of 40%, of the width of the Verticals (be it a Credit Vertical Call or Credit Vertical Put).
So,
for a Short Vertical
❑ $2
strike intervals for the Call and Put Short Verticals, sell the OTM strikes
at +/– Delta 0.25-0.35, to receive
between $0.50 to $0.80 of Credit in Total.
❑ $2.50
strike intervals for the Call and Put Short Verticals, sell the OTM strikes
at +/– Delta 0.25-0.35, to receive
between $0.65 to $1.00 of Credit in Total.
If
you have clear reasons to sell higher Call/Put Deltas, stop at +/- 0.40 Deltas
as the maximum. Otherwise, the odds of retaining the Credit becomes
unfavourable towards the OTM Short strike.
Selling
these consistent fractions of the width of the Verticals making up the
Vertical, regardless of the different strike intervals, exposes the Vertical’s
Short leg to less than ~40% of being touched by price movement. In turn, giving the Vertical’s Short
leg a minimum of 60+% probability of price not touching it, for the position to
retain the Total Credit received.
– At maximum, choose OTM strikes that give the Credit
Vertical’s Short leg a 30% probability of being touched by price movement, i.e.
70% probability of not being touched. Lowering the probability beyond 30% is
margining capital on a credit spread beyond what is efficient that could have
been used for another strategy.
Regardless
of the strike width chosen, the typical method of constructing an entire
Vertical position is to contain the entire position within 1 Standard Deviation
(–1σ and +1σ). Outside –1σ and +1σ makes it difficult to collect sufficient
Credit premium to sell.
However,
beyond the typical method and unique to trading Verticals is the method of
staggering the number of contracts allocated for the entire trade, across an
increasing number of strikes. This method of staggering contracts is similar to
that used for the Credit Iron Condor.
So,
for example, based on the money management rule of allocating 4% of the Net
Liquidating Value per trade, say it translates into 6 Vertical contracts.
❑ Instead
of placing 6 contracts at once on the same strikes, stagger the allocation of 2
contracts at the original OTM Call and Put strikes with the Delta criteria
cited above, 45-50 days to expiry.
❑ Then,
after 5 days (with 40-45 days from expiry remaining), if price moves in the
planned direction, sell another 2 contracts with the same Delta criteria to
Roll down the Credit Vertical Call; or, Roll up the Credit Vertical Put.
❑ Then,
after 5 days (with 30-35 days from expiry remaining), if price moves in the
planned direction, sell the remaining 2 contracts with the same Delta criteria
to Roll down the Credit Vertical Call; or, Roll up the Credit Vertical Put.
–
Within either period of staggering contracts, if price moves drastically
against the planned direction, use the remaining contracts to sell the opposite
Vertical to that initiated (e.g. if you originally sold 2 Credit Vertical Call
contracts for $0.70 Credit; but, price rises, then sell 2 Credit Vertical Put
contracts for ~$0.70 Credit) at an equivalent amount of Credit to offset the original
Vertical for a near break even position. In this case, you’ve legged into an
Iron Condor – contrary to the normal practice of not legging into spreads – but
here it is deliberate to break even at ~$0.00 to write-off the original
Vertical gone wrong.
–
“Rolling” up/down the Credit Vertical Put Spread/Credit Vertical Call with each
allocation of 2 contracts per Roll should be treated as a new trade with its
own individual risk. As this pushes the Vertical’s Break Even point further
aLong the same direction as price movement. If price moves in the planned
direction – making the original 2 Verticals you sold profitable, try to sell
the subsequent 2 Verticals progressively around ~1.25 times more Credit than
the original Credit you sold. Staggering the allocation of Verticals builds in
a step function into the risk, allowing you to ladder up the Profit potential
of the Vertical; yet, still satisfy the money management rule of 2%–5% per
trade. Otherwise, allocating all 6
contracts at one limits the Profit potential to only one level.
❑ Remember to value the
Credit Vertical for its Theoretical Price, to sell it as a credit spread
marginally above the market value by ~0.10. See Price Scout: Work the Entry
Hard.
Open Interest &
Days to Expiry
❑ For a Short Vertical choose strikes with Open Interest between 10-20 times the
number of contracts you plan to fill.
This ensures adequate liquidity, especially when its time to exit the
trade.
❑ Look to fill the Vertical more than 35 days at minimum up to 50 days at maximum
before expiration. Below 30 days,
the Credit collected is insufficient to reward the position for the Delta &
Gamma risk going into the 5-10 days before expiry. Above 50 days, exposes the
Short Vertical to too much IV uncertainty and possibly changes in interest
rates.
Exit
Criteria for Profit/Loss (versus Stay In-Play)
Exit
Criteria for Profit
❑ 10–15 days before expiry, exit both legs of the Vertical; or …
❑ If the Credit Vertical Call or Credit Vertical Puts value has dropped to $0.10–$0.15, buy back only the Short leg. Do not risk the possibility of price retracing in the opposite direction to hit the Short leg within the week of expiration itself.
❑ For the
Long option remaining in the Vertical trading near $0.05, there is not much
value remaining to sell this leg to close it. Buy back only the Short options
in the Verticals. This leaves you with a Long option should price bounce back
unexpectedly.
❑ Always observe the rule of exiting the entire Vertical 10 days before expiry. Only if favourable pricing conditions occur as stated above, then use the variation in closing just the Short leg and leaving the Long option untouched. Otherwise, mechanically exit entirely. Some more experienced traders choose to hold the Vertical till 5–7 days to close it out. Namely, this is what they have consistently done as a routine. Stay consistent with the number of days to exit: if its 10 days stick to it, if the decision to exit is between 5–7 days stick with it.
❑ Before 10–15 days expiry, when 70%–80% of the Vertical’s premium has decayed, exit the entire trade. For e.g., a Vertical sold for $1.00 decays down to $0.20, close out both legs. The remaining 20% of Profit is marginal and not worth the Delta and Gamma risk of remaining in play. It’s not logical to risk the entire $1.00 (of which you’ve already gained ~80%) for less than 20% more Profit to milk in 2+ weeks. Guard against the greed and let sensible fear prevail.
Stay
In-Play, with 15-20 days before expiry, if the
❑ Probability
of Touching the Upside Exit for the Credit Vertical Call and Downside Exit for
the Credit Vertical Put is between 20%–40%. Watch the position when the Probability of Touching the
Short leg drifts between 40%–55%.
❑ Watch
the Vertical more closely, if the iVolatility Hi/Low Indicator drifts aimlessly
between the 0.45–0.55 decile without a clear signal, if IV will drop further or
stay range bound. For example, if IV has already dropped from the 0.80 decile
down to the 0.60 decile, i.e. IV has fallen 2 full deciles = 20%, it may be
bouncing against Support for the IV’s mid-range between the 0.45–0.55 decile
range and fail to fall further.
❑ Be
vigilant when the original Deltas of the short OTM Calls (+0.25 to +0.35), as
Credit Vertical Call grows larger, as price moves towards the Call Vertical
side. And when the original Deltas
of the short OTM Puts (–0.25 to –0.35 ), as a Credit Vertical Put grows larger,
as price moves towards the Put Vertical side.
❑ In either case, this signals the original OTM strikes are at risk of becoming
more costly to buy back, which reduces the Profit of the trade.
Exit
Criteria to Limit Losses
❑ Exit the
entire trade before/during economic or political news that violently increases
the overall market’s Volatility. i.e. VIX shoots up above its daily
volatility range.
❑ The
Probability of Touching the Vertical’s Upside Exit for the Credit Vertical Call
and Downside Exit for the Credit Vertical Put increases from the original 40%
to 60%-70% with 10-15 days before expiry. Either, close out the Short leg only
or the entire Vertical.
❑ IV rises
to raise the Vertical’s value to ~125% of what the Credit spread was sold for
(making it more expensive to buy back), instead of decreasing the premium
collected, which is what is needed to make it cheaper to buy back.
– A Vertical needs to maintain a negative Vega, representing a drop in IV to stay
profitable. The negative Vega needs to become an increasingly larger number for
the forecasted fall in IV to add to Profit. If the negative Vega number gets
progressively
smaller
towards ~0.00, IV is rising and without sufficient positive Theta decay to
offset the IV increase, the position starts incurring Losses. Theta collected
as premium is wiped out by a rising IV, and there may be insufficient days
remaining to collect the adequate amount of premium to restore the drop in the
credit spread. Remember, just as you can only lose 1 day’s worth of decay in a
debit spread, you can only effectively collect one day’s worth of premium per
day in a credit spread.
Long
Vertical Call/Put (Debit spread) Plan: Delta, Gamma & Vega affects Profit;
Theta impacts the Loss.
Debit
Vertical spreads are twins of their Credit counterparts (in reverse). I will only state the obvious
differences and refrain from repeating the opposite elements that you can work
out.
Greeks
Profile for Debit Vertical (Bear) Put: –Delta, +Gamma, +Vega and –Theta
❑ Profit from –Delta getting larger as price falls down and +Gamma gets smaller towards 0.00 and becomes negative. Profit from +Vega means IV needs to increase from a lower range to a higher range.
❑ Loss arises from –Delta
getting smaller as price rises opposing the downtrend, with positive Gamma
becoming smaller.
The
Debit Vertical (Bear) Put is the counterpart of the Credit Vertical (Bear)
Call.
Greeks
Profile for Debit Vertical (Bull) Call: +Delta, +Gamma, +Vega and –Theta
❑ Profit from +Delta
getting larger as price rises up and +Gamma gets smaller towards 0.00 and
becomes negative. Profit from +Vega means IV needs to increase from a lower
range to a higher range.
❑ Loss arises from
+Delta getting smaller as price falls down against the uptrend, with +Gamma
becoming larger.
The
Debit Vertical (Bull) Call is the counterpart of the Credit Vertical (Bull)
Put.
The
Exit and Entry criteria stated for Credit Vertical spreads applies, except it
is reversed to recognize the Debit.
With
Long Verticals, a wider width between strikes allows Delta & Gamma to
expand (within reason) which is required in a directional Debit spread to gain
from the price movement. For both types of Long Verticals:
❑ Buy at minimum 25% up
to a maximum of 35%, of the width of the Verticals (be it a Debit Vertical Call
or Debit Vertical Put).
So,
for a Debit Vertical Call/ Debit Vertical Put with
❑ For
products with $1 strike intervals, widen the construction of the Vertical out
to $2 strike intervals apart, only if you can buy a marginally lower debit by
0.05–0.10 with the $2 strike apart Vertical, than you can with the Vertical
being $1 strike apart. For a $2 strike width apart Vertical, buy the OTM
Call/Put strikes at +/– Delta
0.25-0.35, for a Debit between $0.50 to $0.70 in Total for the entire long
Vertical.
At
maximum, choose a product with strike increments of $2.50. Do not choose a
product with $5-$10 strike intervals, as the change of larger Delta risks is
amplified without any added benefit of improving the ROI on the trade.
❑ For $2.50 strike
intervals, buy the OTM Call/Put strikes at +/- Delta 0.25-0.35, for a Debit between $0.60 to $0.85 in
Total for the entire Vertical.
IV. While at lower IV
levels, you get to buy Long Verticals for a lower Debit, the risk of IV making
lower lows increases. IV forecasting tools from iVolatility.com have been
blended into the Home Options Trading techniques.
❑ An IV forecast in the lower decile range of 0.20–0.30 or 0.60–0.70 increasing
by 0.10 decile (+10%) makes for an ideal Long Vertical opportunity.
❑ If IV is in the decile range of 0.00-0.10, IV could fall to a lower low. IV
falling decreases the Vertical’s Debit value, when we want it to rise to sell
it back for a higher price than what it was purchased for. Choose another
product to construct a Debit Vertical trade on. For an existing Debit Vertical,
exit the position entirely.
❑ If IV is in the decile range of 0.90-1.00, IV could fail to make a higher high.
Again, IV falling decreases the Vertical’s Debit value, when we want it to rise
to sell it back for a higher price than what it was purchased for. Choose
another product to construct a Debit Vertical trade on. For an existing Debit
Vertical, exit the position entirely.
Skew for Debit Verticals
❑ A Negative Skew helps
the long Put’s IV rise as price drops from higher put strikes to lower put
strikes in favour of the direction of the Debit Vertical Put.
❑ A Positive Skew helps
the long Call’s IV rise as price rises from lower call strikes to higher call
strikes in favour of the direction of the Debit Vertical Call.
Days to Expiry
❑ Look to fill the Debit Vertical with 60 days at minimum before the last 30 days
to expiry, i.e. look for candidates 80-90 days out. Only if the Debit paid is
still within 25%–40% of the width of the Vertical, look for a candidate more
than 90 days up to 120 days at maximum.
Exit
Criteria for Profit, Stay In-Play and Limiting Losses
❑ Exit the entire Long Vertical before 30 days to expiry, Theta rises to its highest point of its exponential decay, poised to plummet with 30 days remaining.
❑ Within 45 days to expiry, if the Debit Vertical:
–
increases in value by 1.5 times, scale-off 2/3 to 3/4 of the position to lock
in Profits. Leaving only 1/3–1/4 of the position at risk with 70+% Probability
of Touching the Upside Exit for the Debit Vertical Call and Downside Exit for
the Debit Vertical Put that is profitable, giving you fair odds to sell the
remaining Vertical contracts up to 1.75 times the original Debit. Waiting to sell all contracts of the
Vertical for 2-3 times its original Debit is not recommended.
– reduces in value by 30%–40%, take off 1/3 to 1/2 the position to limit Losses. Leaving 1/2 to 2/3 of the position at risk and stay in-play for another 10-15 days, if IV continues to rise. But if the Probability of Touching the short put of the Debit Vertical Put and the short call of the Debit Vertical Call decreases below ~40%, close out the remaining contracts and exit entirely. Do not wait to incur the Maximum Loss.
❑ Watch
the Vertical more closely, if IV drifts aimlessly between the 0.45– 0.55 decile
without a clear signal, if IV will rise further or stay range bound. If IV has
already risen from the 0.10 decile up to the 0.30 decile, i.e. IV has increased
2 full deciles, it may hitting Resistance at the IV’s mid-range and fail to
rise further.
❑ Do not
fix the busted Debit Vertical. If price moves drastically against the Debit
Vertical spread, exit it entirely.
❑ Open Interest and
remaining Probability of Touching criteria (Upside/Downside, –1σ or +1σ) for
Entries/Exits is similar to that of Credit Verticals.
Now, you may know all the criteria stated here … but … how do you compress it all within 2 hours per day to turn it into a home-based business?
